3 published decisions dealing with: affirmed modification of child support when parents never married; affirmed constitutionality of Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 61.637(17); affirmed order for removal of advertising device with 600 feet of I-65 (sign of semi-trailer).

THREE PUBLISHED DECISIONS.

761. NELSON (SCOTT A.)  VS.  ECKLAR (JENNIFER M.) 
Child support modification.
Affirmed order entered by the Kenton Family Court on April 6, 2017, modifying his child support obligation. Parties never married.

762. AUBREY (JOHN), INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ET AL.  VS.  KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
 Affirmed constitutionality of Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 61.637(17), as amended in 2008.

763. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, TRANSPORTATION CABINET  VS.  ROBARDS (BENJAMIN) 
REVERSING AND REMANDIG. he Commonwealth of Kentucky, Transportation Cabinet appeals from an order of the Bullitt Circuit Court denying its petition to enforce the final order of the Secretary of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet requiring Benjamin Robards to remove an advertising device located within 660 feet of interstate 65 (I-65). We conclude that Robards continues to maintain an advertising device in violation of the Kentucky Billboard Act and reverse and remand for an order directing Robards to remove the advertising sign from a semi- trailer.

SELECTION NOT TO BE PUBLISHED DECISIONS.

767. MCMICHAEL (BARBARA), AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM MCMICHAEL, DECEASED  VS.  GGNSC LOUISVILLE ST. MATTHEWS, LLC, D/B/A GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER – ST. MATTHEWS, ET AL 
Appeals. Failure to name indispensable party.
Affirmed dismissal of personal claim of personal representative who filed the appeal on her consortium claim denominated as Barbara McMichael, as Administratrix of the Estate of William McMichael, rather than in her name individually. The circuit court’s summary judgment denied the relief Barbara McMichael sought individually, on her own behalf, and not the relief sought by the Estate she administered. She is an indispensable party to that loss of consortium claim. That claim alone is before this Court for review. Affirmed.

MINUTES WITH LINKS TO FULL TEXT OF ALL DECISIONS.
Link to Index of COA Minutes by date at AOC.