Category: Trial

Case Notes: Plaintiff prevails in excluding evidence at trial but loses $1.9 million verdict on appeal when it should have come in – Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. vs. Gypsie Thacker (COA, NPO 2/6/2015)

Trying cases is tough.  You are in the arena which can seem like a war zone, making decisions in a blink of an eye, but always keeping the other eye looking to preserve errors for appeal so when the case is “tried”...

Read More

TRIAL PROCEDURE & EVIDENCE: Proffer of expected testimony found by SCOKY to be too vague to preserve error on appeal (Eric Henderson vs. Commonwealth of Kentucky SC Published 8/21/2014)

From the former practice of preserving testimony with an avowal to the KRE 103 proffer of expected testimony, a trap is laid  for the need for specificity and clarity  falling short of the actual avowal of the testimony of...

Read More

Closing Argument – Counsel is Given Wide Latitude When Making Inferences from the Evidence in Addressing an Examining Physician’s Bias and Credibility Based on History of Testifying 3 or 4 times a year for plaintiff’s law firm

The following decision presents an interesting issue on the characterization of examining physicians used in negligence cases to address causation and injuries.  There are treating physicians, and there are...

Read More

Court Costs. Trial Court’s Discretion. Video and transcript of deposition reimbursable; Costs of Trial Exhibits Reimbursable (Occidental Fire and Casualty Co. vs. Moore COA Not Pub. 9/6/2013)

Occidental Fire and Casualty Co. vs. Moore COA Not Pub. 9/6/2013 Court costs included transcript and video of same deponent and costs of trial exhibits.  COA affirmed both awards by the trial judge. Depositions.  The award of...

Read More
Loading

Sign up for Kentucky Court Report Email Updates

Receive postings by email.
* = required field

Most Recent Posts

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

This website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice on any subject matter. By viewing the posts, contents and other information on this website, the reader understands there is no attorney-client relationship between the reader and the website/blog publisher and that it should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney.

Readers are urged to consult their own legal counsel on any specific legal questions concerning a specific situation.