Category: Evidence

Case Notes: Plaintiff prevails in excluding evidence at trial but loses $1.9 million verdict on appeal when it should have come in – Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. vs. Gypsie Thacker (COA, NPO 2/6/2015)

Trying cases is tough.  You are in the arena which can seem like a war zone, making decisions in a blink of an eye, but always keeping the other eye looking to preserve errors for appeal so when the case is “tried”...

Read More

TRIAL PROCEDURE & EVIDENCE: Proffer of expected testimony found by SCOKY to be too vague to preserve error on appeal (Eric Henderson vs. Commonwealth of Kentucky SC Published 8/21/2014)

From the former practice of preserving testimony with an avowal to the KRE 103 proffer of expected testimony, a trap is laid  for the need for specificity and clarity  falling short of the actual avowal of the testimony of...

Read More

TORTS – Punitive damages, impeachment by employment of witness, pain and sufferering prior to death, voir dire, juror signing verdict: Fuel Transport, Inc. v. Gibson (COA 9/25/2009)

Fuel Transport, Inc. v. Gibson2008-CA-000969 9/25/09 2009 WL 3047578 Rehearing pendingOpinion by Judge Clayton; Judge Thompson and Senior Judge Lambert concurred. The Court affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment of the...

Read More

TORTS – TP Negligence claim and workers comp injury, experts, impaired earning capacity, discovery sanctions: Boland-Maloney Lumber Company, Inc. v. Burnett (COA 9/11/2009)

Boland-Maloney Lumber Company, Inc. v. Burnett2008-CA-000059 9/11/09 2009 WL 2901206 DR pendingOpinion by Judge Wine; Judges Acree and Stumbo concurred. The Court affirmed on direct appeal and reversed on cross-appeal a judgment...

Read More
Loading

Sign up for Kentucky Court Report Email Updates

Receive postings by email.
* = required field

Most Recent Posts

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

This website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice on any subject matter. By viewing the posts, contents and other information on this website, the reader understands there is no attorney-client relationship between the reader and the website/blog publisher and that it should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney.

Readers are urged to consult their own legal counsel on any specific legal questions concerning a specific situation.