Select Page
Posted by Michael Stevens | Nov 13, 2007 | COA Decisions, Criminal Law |
CAPSHAW V. COM.CRIMINAL: RAPE SHIELD LAW2006-CA-001918PUBLISHED: AFFIRMINGPANEL: MOORE PRESIDING; HOWARD, GUIDUGLI CONCURCOUNTY: MONROEDATE RENDERED: 10/05/2007 CA affirmed TC’s exclusion under the Rape Shield Law (KRE...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 13, 2007 | COA Decisions, Criminal Law |
SHEARER V. COM.CRIMINAL: INTERROGATION – CONSENT2006-CA-001883PUBLISHED: AFFIRMINGPANEL: LAMBERT PRESIDING; HOWARD,GUIDUGLI CONCURCOUNTY: FAYETTEDATE RENDERED: 10/05/2007 TC properly rejected Shearer’s argument that...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 13, 2007 | COA Decisions, Criminal Law |
BISHOP V. COM.CRIMINAL: EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES2006-CA-001636PUBLISHED: AFFIRMINGPANEL: VANMETER PRESIDING; KELLER GUIDUGLI CONCURCOUNTY: MADISONDATE RENDERED: 10/05/2007 TC did not err by denying Bishop’s motion to suppress...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 13, 2007 | COA Decisions, Criminal Law |
DEAN V. COM.CRIMINAL: INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL2006-CA-001422PUBLISHED: REVERSING AND REMANDINGDATE RENDERED: 10/05/2007 CA found Defendant was entitled to new trial based upon ineffective assistance of counsel....
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 13, 2007 | COA Decisions, Criminal Law |
PERKINS V. COM.CRIMINAL: THIRD PARTY CONSENT TO SEARCH2006-CA-000934PUBLISHED: AFFIRMINGPANEL: COMBS PRESIDING; ACREE AND HENRY CONCURCOUNTY: KNOTTDATE RENDERED: 10/05/2007 TC properly denied Perkin’s motion to...
Read MoreThis website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice on any subject matter. By viewing the posts, contents and other information on this website, the reader understands there is no attorney-client relationship between the reader and the website/blog publisher and that it should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney.
Readers are urged to consult their own legal counsel on any specific legal questions concerning a specific situation.