Select Page
Posted by Michael Stevens | Nov 28, 2007 | SCOKY Decisions, Workers Compensation |
SHELBY MOTOR CO., INC. V. QUIREWORKERS COMP: Tolling of Statute of limitations and Preservation of Issues2006-SC-000884-WC.pdfPUBLISHED: REVERSING; OPINION OF THE COURTDATE RENDERED: 10/31/2007 The Supreme...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 28, 2007 | SCOKY Decisions, Workers Compensation |
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FAMILY PRACTICE V. LEACHWORKERS COMP: Statute of Limitations and Cumulative Trauma2007-SC-000051-WC.pdfPUBLISHED: AFFIRMING; OPINION OF THE COURT The Supreme court affirmed an award of medical...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 28, 2007 | SCOKY Decisions, Workers Compensation |
RUSSELVILLE WAREHOUSING V. BASHAM, DECEASEDWORKERS COMP: REOPENING2006-SC-000885-WC.pdfPUBLISHED: 862 AFFIRMING; OPINION OF COURTDATE RENDERED: 10/31/2007 Reopening was denied on the grounds of mistake or newly...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 28, 2007 | Insurance, SCOKY Decisions |
WITTEN, M.D. VS. BONNIE PACK, ADMINISTRATRIXMEDICAL NEGLIGENCE2005-SC-000414-DG.pdfPUBLISHED: REVERSING; OPINION WRITTEN BY – SCOTTDATE RENDERED: 10/31/2007 The Supreme Court denies Edwards’...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Nov 28, 2007 | Family Law, Divorce, Juveniles, SCOKY Decisions |
HINSHAW (NOW LENARZ) V. HINSHAWFAMILY LAW: EQUITABLE AVOIDANCE AND PATERNITY2006-SC-000729-DGE.pdfPUBLISHED: 605 AFFIRMING; OPINION WRITTEN BY – CUNNINGHAMDATE RENDERED: 10/31/2007 Mom appealed CA’s opinion...
Read MoreThis website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice on any subject matter. By viewing the posts, contents and other information on this website, the reader understands there is no attorney-client relationship between the reader and the website/blog publisher and that it should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney.
Readers are urged to consult their own legal counsel on any specific legal questions concerning a specific situation.