Author: Michael Stevens

Family Court had subject matter jurisdiction on parent’s relocation to another county upon remarriage since it had determined that the moving papers were sufficient: COFFMAN V. RANKIN (SC 6/19/2008)

Posted by | Aug 26, 2008 | , |

COFFMAN V. RANKINFAMILY LAW:  Change of custody upon parent’s relocation 2007-SC-000348-DGE.pdfPUBLISHED: REVERSINGOPINION BY LAMBERT; CUNNINGHAM DISSENTS BY SEP. OPINION WITH SCHRODER AND SCOTT JOINING IN DISSENTFROM...

Read More

Claims Against Local Govt’s Act requires local governments to defend former employees when proper notice has been given: RICHARDSON V. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT (SC 6/19/2008)

Posted by | Aug 26, 2008 | , , |

RICHARDSON V. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT: Claims Against Local Govt’s Act requires local governments to defend former employees when proper notice has been given 2006-SC-000502-DG.pdfPUBLISHED:...

Read More

“Furnished” and “owned” have two distinct connotations and that the State Farm exclusion did not preclude UIM coverage for decedent under the parents’ policy: WILLIAMS V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (SC 6/19/2008)

Posted by | Aug 26, 2008 | , |

WILLIAMS V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATIONINSURANCE: UIM –  "furnished" and "owned" have two distinct connotations and that the State Farm exclusion did not preclude UIM coverage for...

Read More

Most Recent Posts

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

This website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice on any subject matter. By viewing the posts, contents and other information on this website, the reader understands there is no attorney-client relationship between the reader and the website/blog publisher and that it should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney.

Readers are urged to consult their own legal counsel on any specific legal questions concerning a specific situation.