Select Page
Posted by Michael Stevens | Feb 27, 2009 | COA Decisions, Employment Law / Gov't Retirement, Government |
Transportation Cabinet, Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Caudill2007-CA-001864 02/27/2009 2009 WL 484984Opinion by Judge Thompson; Judge Stumbo concurred; Senior Judge Guidugli concurred in result only. The Court affirmed an order of...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Feb 27, 2009 | COA Decisions, Insurance, Workers Compensation |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Slusher2008-CA-000169 02/27/2009 2009 WL 485027Opinion by Judge Wine; Judge Caperton concurred; Judge Taylor dissented by separate opinion. The Court affirmed a judgment of the...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Feb 22, 2009 | Government, SCOKY Decisions |
2006-SC-000903-DG 1/22/2009Opinion by Justice Schroder. All sitting; all concur. Louisville initiated annexation proceedings over the property at issue in 1984.However, the annexation process was never completed. In...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Feb 22, 2009 | Blog Updates (this blog) |
Effective immediately and unless otherwise noted, all summaries and digests of published decisions of the Supreme Court of Kentucky and the Court of Appeals of Kentucky will be from the published summaries found at the AOC web...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Feb 22, 2009 | Government, SCOKY Decisions |
2007-SC-000950-DG 1/22/2009 Opinion by Justice Schroder. All sitting; all concur. Pursuant to KRS 13B.140, Wilkins had 30 days to appeal the Franklin Circuit Court’s denial of disability retirement benefits. ...
Read MoreThis website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice on any subject matter. By viewing the posts, contents and other information on this website, the reader understands there is no attorney-client relationship between the reader and the website/blog publisher and that it should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney.
Readers are urged to consult their own legal counsel on any specific legal questions concerning a specific situation.