Select Page
Posted by Michael Stevens | Apr 25, 2013 | Medical, Motions - Default, Set Aside, SJ etc., Torts, Trial |
MARLOW(PATRICIA), AS ADMINISTRATRIX, ET AL. VS. BUCK (JAMES) OPINION AFFIRMING NICKELL (PRESIDING JUDGE) MOORE (CONCURS) AND TAYLOR (CONCURS IN RESULT ONLY) 2012-CA-000125-MR 2012-CA-000189-MR NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 4/12/2013...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Apr 25, 2013 | COA Decisions, Damages |
OLIVER (ROBERT C.) VS. HILLIARD (J.J.B.), ET AL. OPINION AFFIRMING IN PART, REVERSING IN PART AND REMANDING CLAYTON (PRESIDING JUDGE) COMBS (CONCURS) AND THOMPSON (DISSENTS) 2010-CA-001138-MR 2010-CA-001236-MR;...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Apr 25, 2013 | Causes of Action, COA Decisions |
247. Legal Malpractice, assignments and real party in interest; tolling of the statute of limitations. Davis vs. Scott, Hardin County BEFORE: CAPERTON, LAMBERT, AND NICKELL, JUDGES. COA, Not Published, 3/8/2013 NICKELL, JUDGE:...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Apr 25, 2013 | Civil Procedure, COA Decisions |
Liberal construction of pleading rules. CR 8.01 CARDWELL (WILLIAM A.) VS. MILLER (REX), ET AL. OPINION REVERSING AND REMANDING DIXON (PRESIDING JUDGE) CAPERTON (CONCURS) AND TAYLOR (CONCURS) 2012-CA-000400-MR NOT TO BE...
Read MorePosted by Michael Stevens | Apr 25, 2013 | COA Decisions, Motions - Default, Set Aside, SJ etc. |
232. Rule 11. COA affirmed denial of sanctions. 3/1/2013 Published Decision by COA Lexington Investment Co. vs. Randy Willeroy MAZE, JUDGE: Lexington Investment Company, Inc. and Mathew Stockham (collectively, “the Brokers”)...
Read MoreThis website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice on any subject matter. By viewing the posts, contents and other information on this website, the reader understands there is no attorney-client relationship between the reader and the website/blog publisher and that it should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney.
Readers are urged to consult their own legal counsel on any specific legal questions concerning a specific situation.