JACKSON V. COMMONWEALTH
CRIMINAL – Fight evidence of guilt
TC did not err in admitting evidence of Jackson’s flight after he posted bond and was released from custody prior to trial. Conviction for possession of a handgun by a convicted felon and being a persistent felony offender in the first degree affirmed. CA concluded that the evidence of flight in this case was admissible pursuant to KRE 404(b)(1) to show "an expression of a sense of guilt."
In Rodriguez v. Commonwealth, 107 S.W.3d 215 (Ky.2003), the Kentucky Supreme Court determined that the common-law rule regarding the admissibility of evidence of flight survived the adoption of the Kentucky Rules of Evidence (KRE) as a rule of relevancy. Id. at 219. The court explained that "evidence of flight is admissible because it has a tendency to make the existence of the defendant’s guilt more probable: a guilty person probably would act like a guilty person."