Being the defense lawyer, I’m still very sympathetic with plaintiff’s lawyers, not try very hard to see the value of the case and try very hard to be sure that the insurance company recognizes that value. The more experienced the plaintiff’s lawyer, the more you settle, because an experienced plaintiff’s lawyer also knows the value of the case. Inexperienced, young plaintiff’s lawyers are likely to greatly overvalue their case, and sometimes plaintiff’s lawyers cannot control their client. They would settle, but the client wants a greater sum.
~ Norma Foster Adams
Kentucky Lawyers Speak, page 20.
The likely jury verdict affects the value of a case which affects the settlement value of a case. Thus, the lawyer’s reputation for trying a case, their experience, and reputation are just one of the factors that affect an opponent’s number. T’is true as much as we do not wish or like to admit it.
The public perception of lawyers has greatly diminished in quality. It would be interesting if someone could do a study to see what the difference in lawyers then and now is. I think for the most part, they’re probably better. The competition has made them do that. There is no longer the good-old-boy system. There is more demand that you be ethical than there was 50 years ago, but that’s not the way the public perceives us I’ve always been proud of being a lawyer.
~Norma Foster Adams
Kentucky Lawyers Speak, p. 21.
“I think the best thing for a young lawyer to do today would be be associate himself with some person he highly respects as a member of the Bar and learn from that person. I think that’s the best way to get adjusted to the challenge of law practice after you get through law school. To be a lawyer is to have a real privilege and with that privilege goes responsibility.”
~Philip P. Ardery
Taken from “Kentucky Lawyers Speak”, page 29.
We had a lawyer named H.K. Spear who was sort of a character, and one day the judge said ‘General’ (they called him General because he’d been with the Kentucky Attorney General’s Office). ‘Will you give me some law on that?’ [And] He said, ‘Judge, if I had it, believe me, you would have already had it!’
~ Norma Foster Adams
Kentucky Lawyers Speak”, page 19.
When the judge ask you if you have any law on a position, will you have an answer in the ready.
Are you prepared to provide precedent on point or which can reasonably be extended to support your position. If the precedent looks bad for you, can you distinguish it on facts or law or both? And if the law is silent on your exact point, is there law from another jurisdiction that is probative that would help? And never, ever forget the equitable reasons that your cause is just. Something more than, “no can do.”
Be prepared, be ready, be responsive.
Walter Gretzky had some pretty good advice for his superstar hockey player of a son — Wayne, “Skate to where the puck is going, not where it has been.”
You got to see the where the puck is going to be ready to plan your next move.
From “Kentucky Lawyers Speak”, Norma Foster Adams, page 19.